Abstract

Changes in soil microbiotic properties such as microbial biomass and community structure in response to alternative management systems are driven by microbial substrate quality and substrate utilization. We evaluated irrigated crop and forage production in two separate four-year experiments for differences in microbial substrate quality, microbial biomass and community structure, and microbial substrate utilization under conventional, organic, and reduced-tillage management systems. The six different management systems were imposed on fields previously under long-term, intensively tilled maize production. Soils under crop and forage production responded to conversion from monocropping to crop rotation, as well as to the three different management systems, but in different ways. Under crop production, four years of organic management resulted in the highest soil organic C (SOC) and microbial biomass concentrations, while under forage production, reduced-tillage management most effectively increased SOC and microbial biomass. There were significant increases in relative abundance of bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, with two- to 36-fold increases in biomarker phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs). Under crop production, dissolved organic C (DOC) content was higher under organic management than under reduced-tillage and conventional management. Perennial legume crops and organic soil amendments in the organic crop rotation system apparently favored greater soil microbial substrate availability, as well as more microbial biomass compared with other management systems that had fewer legume crops in rotation and synthetic fertilizer applications. Among the forage production management systems with equivalent crop rotations, reduced-tillage management had higher microbial substrate availability and greater microbial biomass than other management systems. Combined crop rotation, tillage management, soil amendments, and legume crops in rotations considerably influenced soil microbiotic properties. More research will expand our understanding of combined effects of these alternatives on feedbacks between soil microbiotic properties and SOC accrual.

Highlights

  • Many changes in soil properties after conversion from one agricultural management system to another result from changes in soil microbiotic properties, defined here as the quality of microbial substrate and its effects on soil microbial communities [1,2]

  • Practices used in certified-organic food and feed production, including amendments and legume crops in rotations, support increased microbial biomass [1,4], arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) [5], and soil fauna [4]

  • Under forage production, with the same rotation across the three management systems, reduced tillage had significantly more year4 soil organic C (SOC) than the other two system, indicating that organic amendments combined with intensive tillage did not increase SOC. These results suggest that reduced-tillage combined with legumes in rotation had the largest impacts on SOC accrual

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many changes in soil properties after conversion from one agricultural management system to another result from changes in soil microbiotic properties, defined here as the quality of microbial substrate and its effects on soil microbial communities [1,2]. Practices used in certified-organic food and feed production, including amendments and legume crops in rotations, support increased microbial biomass [1,4], arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) [5], and soil fauna [4]. It is not as clear how beneficial these management practices are under marginally productive conditions of cold, semiarid agroecosystems. In the study reported here, we evaluated whole-system effects on soil microbiotic properties after conversion from irrigated maize monoculture to conventional, reduced-tillage, and organic crop rotation systems in the central High Plains region of North. Each management system combines a different suite of practices, including cultivation methods, crop rotations, and soil amendments

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.