Abstract

Soil liquefaction is one of the most complicated phenomena to assess in geotechnical earthquake engineering. The conventional procedures developed to determine the liquefaction potential of sandy soil deposits can be categorized into three main groups: Stress-based, strain-based, and energy-based procedures. The main advantage of the energy-based approach over the remaining two methods is the fact that it considers the effects of strain and stress concurrently unlike the stress or strain-based methods. Several liquefaction evaluation procedures and approaches have been developed relating the capacity energy to the initial soil parameters, such as the relative density, initial effective confining pressure, fine contents, and soil textural properties. In this study, based on the capacity energy database by Baziar et al. (2011), analyses have been carried out on a total of 405 previously published tests using soft computing approaches, including Ridge, Lasso & LassoCV, Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) approaches, to assess the capacity energy required to trigger liquefaction in sand and silty sands. The results clearly prove the capability of the proposed models and the capacity energy concept to assess liquefaction resistance of soils. It is also proposed that these approaches should be used as cross-validation against each other. The result shows that the capacity energy is most sensitive to the relative density.

Highlights

  • Liquefaction is a catastrophic ground failure, which usually occurs in loose saturated soil deposits under earthquake excitations

  • The input feature importance of a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (Lasso) model can be evaluated through the weight coefficient using the L1 -norm based sparse linear model or using the approach known as analysis of variance (ANOVA) decomposition

  • It was found that when α was between 0.1 and 0.001, the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination curves remained almost constant in both the training and testing set

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Liquefaction is a catastrophic ground failure, which usually occurs in loose saturated soil deposits under earthquake excitations. A strain-based approach which originated frompressure the model of two grainDobry systemetand thensuggested extend to the actual soil layers. Of sand type, relative density, initial effective pressure, and sample preparation method This strain-based approach is less popular than the stress-based procedure because it is much more difficult to estimate the cyclic strain compared with the cyclic shear stress [15]. Davis and Berrill [16] introduced an energy-based approach for liquefaction potential assessment. The energy-based method buildup hadbasic direct seismic dissipated in the unit volume of soil. Total strain energy at the onset of The liquefaction based method absorbs the basic of both the stress and strain approach. A-B-C-D represents the dissipated energy per unit volume for a kth stress cycle.

Typical
Ridge Regression Algorithm
Lasso and LassoCV Algorithm
Random Forest Regression Algorithm
XGBoost
Schematic of XGBoost
MARS Methodology
Performance Measures
The Database
Ridge Modeling Results
Comparison between between the target target and and Ridge
Lasso and LassoCV Analysis
RF Modeling Result
21. Variation
XGBoost Modeling Result
Result
23. RMSE versus parameter estimators the eXtreme
25. Comparison
MARS Modeling Result
31. Variation
Comparison the Results
33. Performance
Conclusions
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call