Abstract
Controversy has long surrounded the question of nutritional differences between crops grown organically or using now-conventional methods, with studies dating back to the 1940s showing that farming methods can affect the nutrient density of crops. More recent studies have shown how reliance on tillage and synthetic nitrogen fertilizers influence soil life, and thereby soil health, in ways that can reduce mineral micronutrient uptake by and phytochemical production in crops. While organic farming tends to enhance soil health and conventional practices degrade it, relying on tillage for weed control on both organic and conventional farms degrades soil organic matter and can disrupt soil life in ways that reduce crop mineral uptake and phytochemical production. Conversely, microbial inoculants and compost and mulch that build soil organic matter can increase crop micronutrient and phytochemical content on both conventional and organic farms. Hence, agronomic effects on nutritional profiles do not fall out simply along the conventional vs. organic distinction, making the effects of farming practices on soil health a better lens for assessing their influence on nutrient density. A review of previous studies and meta-studies finds little evidence for significant differences in crop macronutrient levels between organic and conventional farming practices, as well as substantial evidence for the influence of different cultivars and farming practices on micronutrient concentrations. More consistent differences between organic and conventional crops include that conventional crops contain greater pesticide levels, whereas organically grown crops contain higher levels of phytochemicals shown to exhibit health-protective antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Thus, part of the long-running controversy over nutritional differences between organic and conventional crops appears to arise from different definitions of what constitutes a nutrient—the conventional definition of dietary constituents necessary for growth and survival, or a broader one that also encompasses compounds beneficial for maintenance of health and prevention of chronic disease. For assessing the effects of farming practices on nutrient density soil health adds a much needed dimension—the provisioning of micronutrients and phytochemicals that support human health.
Highlights
In the Twentieth century, now-conventional agronomic practices of frequent mechanical tillage and copious chemical fertilizer and pesticide applications displaced traditional practices incorporating cover crops and diverse crop rotations
Soil health defined by the abundance, diversity, and activity of soil life offers a different way to frame understanding the effects of farming practices on the nutritional profile of crops
Early studies pointed to contrasting effects of soil organic matter and chemical fertilizers on soil life in influencing the composition of crops, understanding why lay beyond the scope of conventional thinking
Summary
In the Twentieth century, now-conventional agronomic practices of frequent mechanical tillage and copious chemical fertilizer and pesticide applications displaced traditional practices incorporating cover crops and diverse crop rotations. Tillage and chemical fertilizers affect soil health through reducing soil organic matter and the diversity and abundance of soil life Such changes can influence nutrient cycling, crop mineral uptake, and phytochemical production. As organic farming tends to rely on tillage for weed control, and conventional farming relies on heavy use of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers, both systems can adversely impact soil life, and thereby mineral uptake and phytochemical production. In this way, soil health defined by the abundance, diversity, and activity of soil life offers a different way to frame understanding the effects of farming practices on the nutritional profile of crops. Evidence for such a connection emerged in the early days of nowconventional practices
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.