Abstract

Abstract. Soil organic matter (SOM) is key to maintaining soil fertility, mitigating climate change, combatting land degradation, and conserving above- and below-ground biodiversity and associated soil processes and ecosystem services. In order to derive management options for maintaining these essential services provided by soils, policy makers depend on robust, predictive models identifying key drivers of SOM dynamics. Existing SOM models and suggested guidelines for future SOM modelling are defined mostly in terms of plant residue quality and input and microbial decomposition, overlooking the significant regulation provided by soil fauna. The fauna controls almost any aspect of organic matter turnover, foremost by regulating the activity and functional composition of soil microorganisms and their physical–chemical connectivity with soil organic matter. We demonstrate a very strong impact of soil animals on carbon turnover, increasing or decreasing it by several dozen percent, sometimes even turning C sinks into C sources or vice versa. This is demonstrated not only for earthworms and other larger invertebrates but also for smaller fauna such as Collembola. We suggest that inclusion of soil animal activities (plant residue consumption and bioturbation altering the formation, depth, hydraulic properties and physical heterogeneity of soils) can fundamentally affect the predictive outcome of SOM models. Understanding direct and indirect impacts of soil fauna on nutrient availability, carbon sequestration, greenhouse gas emissions and plant growth is key to the understanding of SOM dynamics in the context of global carbon cycling models. We argue that explicit consideration of soil fauna is essential to make realistic modelling predictions on SOM dynamics and to detect expected non-linear responses of SOM dynamics to global change. We present a decision framework, to be further developed through the activities of KEYSOM, a European COST Action, for when mechanistic SOM models include soil fauna. The research activities of KEYSOM, such as field experiments and literature reviews, together with dialogue between empiricists and modellers, will inform how this is to be done.

Highlights

  • Despite continuous refinement over the past decades, estimates of the global carbon cycle still show large discrepancies between potential and observed carbon fluxes (Ballantyne et al, 2012; Schmitz et al, 2014)

  • How important animal activities are for manifold geological and pedological processes has been reviewed repeatedly (e.g. Swift et al, 1979; Wilkinson et al, 2009), but carbon turnover – which is highly dynamic and both directly and indirectly affected by animals – had never been the focus. Due to their prime role in most processes in soil (Briones, 2014), we mostly focus on earthworms, and give examples for other groups of soil fauna whose role in C turnover appears to be much more relevant than thought far (e.g. David, 2014)

  • We introduce a new COST Action (ES 1406) that is working on the implementation of soil fauna into Soil organic matter (SOM) models, exploring the pros and caveats in such a process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite continuous refinement over the past decades, estimates of the global carbon cycle still show large discrepancies between potential and observed carbon fluxes (Ballantyne et al, 2012; Schmitz et al, 2014). The predictive power of current global SOM models is, limited, as the majority rely on a relatively restricted set of input parameters such as climate, land use, vegetation, pedological characteristics and microbial biomass (Davidson and Janssens, 2006). Other parameters, such as the leaching of organic matter or soil erosion of organic matter, have been suggested for improving model predictions, and recent research has demonstrated what drastic effects, for example, living roots (Lindén et al, 2014) and soil fungi (Clemmensen et al, 2013) exert on SOM persistence. We introduce a new COST Action (ES 1406) that is working on the implementation of soil fauna into SOM models, exploring the pros and caveats in such a process

Key insights
Molecular structure
Humic substances
Soil microorganisms
Fire-derived carbon
Physical heterogeneity
Soil depth
Permafrost
Aggregate formation
Implications for modelling
Ways to proceed
Findings
Conclusions and outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call