Abstract

Changes in the quality and quantity of litter and root inputs due to climate change and human activities can influence below-ground biogeochemical processes in forest ecosystems. However, it is unclear whether and how much aboveground litter and root inputs affect soil microbial metabolism and nutrient limitation mechanisms. In this study, according to a 4-years field manipulation experiment, litter and root manipulations (control (CK), double litter input (DL), no litter (NL), no root (NR), and no inputs (NI)) were set up to analyze the extracellular enzyme activities and stoichiometric ratios characteristics of 0–10 cm and 10–20 cm soils, explore the metabolic limitations of microorganisms, and clarify the main driving factors restricting nutrient limitation. The results showed that the enzyme activities associated with the C cycling (β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), cellulose disaccharide hydrolase (CBH)) and N cycling (β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), leucine aminopeptidase (LAP)) in DL treatment were significantly higher than those in NR treatment. Moreover, enzyme activities related to P cycling are significantly higher in comparison to other treatments. The acid phosphatase (AP), which is related to the P cycle, showed the highest activity under NR treatment. In addition, there was no significant difference in soil microbial metabolic limitation by the different carbon inputs, which did not change the original nutrient limitation pattern. The main drivers of microbial nutrient metabolic limitation included soil physicochemical properties, soil total nutrients, and available nutrients, among which soil SWC and pH presented the greatest influence on microbial C limitation and soil total nutrients showed the greatest influence on microbial N limitation. Changes in soil carbon input altered soil extracellular enzyme activities and their stoichiometric ratios by affecting soil physicochemical properties, total nutrients. This study provides data for the understanding of material cycling in forest ecosystems under environmental change.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call