Abstract

Abstract. Soil erosion in Alpine areas is mainly related to extreme topographic and weather conditions. Although different methods of assessing soil erosion exist, the knowledge of erosive forces of the snow cover needs more investigation in order to allow soil erosion modeling in areas where the snow lays on the ground for several months. This study aims to assess whether the RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) empirical prediction model, which gives an estimation of water erosion in t ha yr−1 obtained from a combination of five factors (rainfall erosivity, soil erodibility, topography, soil cover, protection practices) can be applied to mountain areas by introducing a winter factor (W), which should account for the soil erosion occurring in winter time by the snow cover. The W factor is calculated from the ratio of Ceasium-137 (137Cs) to RUSLE erosion rates. Ceasium-137 is another possible way of assessing soil erosion rates in the field. In contrast to RUSLE, it not only provides water-induced erosion but integrates all erosion agents involved. Thus, we hypothesize that in mountain areas the difference between the two approaches is related to the soil erosion by snow. In this study we compared 137Cs-based measurement of soil redistribution and soil loss estimated with RUSLE in a mountain slope affected by avalanches, in order to assess the relative importance of winter erosion processes such as snow gliding and full-depth avalanches. Three subareas were considered: DS, avalanche defense structures, RA, release area, and TA, track area, characterized by different prevalent winter processes. The RUSLE estimates and the 137Cs redistribution gave significantly different results. The resulting ranges of W evidenced relevant differences in the role of winter erosion in the considered subareas, and the application of an avalanche simulation model corroborated these findings. Thus, the higher rates obtained with the 137Cs method confirmed the relevant role of winter soil erosion. Despite the limited sample size (11 points), the inclusion of a W factor in RUSLE seems promising for the improvement of soil erosion estimates in Alpine environments affected by snow movements.

Highlights

  • Soil erosion hazard largely affects mountain areas worldwide (JRC, 2009), and environments subject to natural and anthropogenic disturbance (Litschert et al, 2014).While the causes and effects of erosion as a soil degradation threat in the world are widely described and investigated (Lal, 2001), soil loss estimation in sloping areas still has some uncertainties, as the methods commonly used are not designed for mountain environments, where climate and relief are extreme (Alewell et al, 2008; Garcia Rodriguez et al, 2012)

  • This study aims to assess whether the RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) empirical prediction model, which gives an estimation of water erosion in t ha yr−1 obtained from a combination of five factors can be applied to mountain areas by introducing a winter factor (W ), which should account for the soil erosion occurring in winter time by the snow cover

  • Despite the limited sample size (11 points), the inclusion of a W factor in RUSLE seems promising for the improvement of soil erosion estimates in Alpine environments affected by snow movements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil erosion hazard largely affects mountain areas worldwide (JRC, 2009), and environments subject to natural and anthropogenic disturbance (Litschert et al, 2014).While the causes and effects of erosion as a soil degradation threat in the world are widely described and investigated (Lal, 2001), soil loss estimation in sloping areas still has some uncertainties, as the methods commonly used are not designed for mountain environments, where climate and relief are extreme (Alewell et al, 2008; Garcia Rodriguez et al, 2012). Soil erosion hazard largely affects mountain areas worldwide (JRC, 2009), and environments subject to natural and anthropogenic disturbance (Litschert et al, 2014). (2012), and more recently Korup et al (2014), proved that snow movements are a significant agent of soil redistribution at mountain sites. Stanchi et al.: Soil erosion in an avalanche release site al. Within these snow movements, wet avalanches are well known for their high sediment yields (Gardner, 1983; Ackroyd, 1987; Bell et al, 1990; Jomelli and Bertran, 2001; Heckmann et al, 2005); so far regionalization and parameterization of these processes are missing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call