Abstract
Vegetation plays an important role in determining soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks, and influences the mechanisms through which SOC is stabilized within the soil. The type of vegetation selected for use in reclamation may therefore influence the accumulation rate and residence time of SOC in these ecosystems. Earlier studies at reclaimed sites in the Alberta Oil Sands demonstrated that reclaimed ecosystems planted with deciduous trees accumulated the most soil organic matter in the top 10 cm of reclamation material, followed by grass sites, while coniferous sites accumulated the least SOM. The objective of this study was to assess differences in SOC stabilization in the upper 10 cm of soil among revegetated deciduous, coniferous and grass ecosystems 20–40 years following reclamation. We compared soil C in unprotected, physically protected, and chemically protected forms among the three reclamation treatments using density flotation to isolate free particulate (unprotected) SOC from the soil sample, and size fractionation to separate the remaining sample into heavy particulate (physically protected) SOC and mineral-associated (chemically protected) SOC. In addition to this analysis, we used NaOCl oxidation to distinguish chemically resistant and chemically oxidizable C stocks. Chemically resistant C was consistent across all vegetation treatments at approximately 25% of total soil C, while the remaining 75% was chemically oxidizable. Total SOC stocks were also not significantly different among vegetation treatments. Deciduous sites had 57.8 Mg ha–1 SOC, grass sites had 52.7 Mg ha–1 SOC, and coniferous sites had 43.7 Mg ha–1 SOC. Two-thirds of total SOC at grass sites was in protected forms, compared to half of total SOC at coniferous sites and one-third of total SOC at deciduous sites (33.6, 22.6, and 15.6 Mg ha–1, respectively). Grass sites had significantly more physically protected SOC than deciduous sites while deciduous sites had more unprotected SOC than grass sites. Our findings indicate that the type of vegetation selected for reclaimed areas has important implications for soil carbon in persistent versus unprotected pools.
Highlights
Most organic carbon (C) in terrestrial ecosystems, approximately 1,400 petagrams, is stored in soil (Scharlemann et al, 2014), and restoration of disturbed ecosystems presents an opportunity to sequester atmospheric CO2 into persistent forms of soil C (Lal et al, 2018)
Total root biomass was greater at deciduous sites than at grass sites (p = 0.08), primarily due to the abundance of very fine roots at deciduous sites
More than half of total root biomass at deciduous and grass sites was in the form of very fine roots, while coarse roots made up the biggest portion of root biomass at coniferous sites (40%)
Summary
Most organic carbon (C) in terrestrial ecosystems, approximately 1,400 petagrams, is stored in soil (Scharlemann et al, 2014), and restoration of disturbed ecosystems presents an opportunity to sequester atmospheric CO2 into persistent forms of soil C (Lal et al, 2018). Forms of SOC that have short residence times and respond quickly to changes in climate or land use are referred to as labile or fast-cycling SOC, while forms that have longer residence times and respond more slowly are typically referred to as stable SOC (Soucémarianadin et al, 2018) These forms are not inherently stable; rather they are in a state of “dynamic stability” due to biological, environmental, and physicochemical constraints on decomposition (Dynarski et al, 2020), and so can be better described as persistent or slow-cycling forms. Organic particles can become physically protected through incorporation into soil aggregates where they are partially protected from microbial enzymes (heavy particulate organic matter or hPOM-C) Within this physically protected pool, SOC is stored in different size classes of aggregates that offer varying degrees of protection. Fast-cycling soil C can promote the production of persistent SOC by stimulating production of microbial biomass, residues and decay products (Kleber et al, 2011; Dungait et al, 2012; Cotrufo et al, 2013)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
