Software Refactoring Network: An Improved Software Refactoring Prediction Framework Using Hybrid Networking‐Based Deep Learning Approach

Abstract

ABSTRACTSoftware refactoring plays a vital role in maintaining and improving the quality of software systems. The software refactoring network aims to connect developers, researchers, and practitioners to share knowledge, best practices, and tools related to refactoring. However, the network faces various challenges, such as the complexity of software systems, the diversity of refactoring techniques, and the need for automated and intelligent solutions to assist developers in making refactoring decisions. By leveraging deep learning techniques, the software refactoring network can enhance the speed, accuracy, and relevance of refactoring suggestions, ultimately improving the overall quality and maintainability of software systems. So, in this paper, an advanced deep learning–based software refactoring framework is proposed. The suggested model performs three phases as (a) data collection, (b) feature extraction, and (c) prediction of software refactoring. Initially, the data is collected from ordinary datasets. Then, the collected data is fed to the feature extraction stage, where the source code, process, and ownership metrics of all refactored and non‐refactored data are retrieved for further processing. After that, the extracted features are predicted using Adaptive and Attentive Dilation Adopted Hybrid Network (AADHN) techniques, in which it is performed using Deep Temporal Context Networks (DTCN) with a Bidirectional Long‐Short Term Memory (Bi‐LSTM) model. Here, the parameters in the hybrid networking model are optimized with the help of Constant Integer Updated Golden Tortoise Beetle Optimizer (CIU‐GTBO) for improving the prediction process. Therefore, the accuracy of the developed algorithm has achieved for different datasets, whereas it shows the value of 96.41, 96.38, 96.38, 96.38, 96.41, 96.38, and 96.39 for antlr4, junit, mapdb, mcMMO, mct, oryx, and titan. Also, the precision of the developed model has shown the better performance of 96.38, 96.32, 96.37, 96.33, 96.35, 96.37, and 96.31 for the datasets like antlr4, junit, mapdb, mcMMO, mct, oryx, and titan.