Abstract
Commitment devices restricting future behavior have demonstrated promise in helping individuals improve their savings behavior, yet often suffer from low take‐up. We test a new “soft” commitment account that asks borrowers to think about their savings goals, how it would feel to achieve them, and make a pledge to work toward these goals, yet has no external restrictions on savings behavior. In a six‐month randomized experiment among consumers that find it difficult to meet their savings needs, we find that such soft commitments can significantly increase initial savings relative to either a hard commitment account (that prevents withdrawals) or a traditional savings account. In addition, the soft commitments significantly increased final savings balances relative to no form of commitment and were particularly effective for impatient individuals. Despite the lower initial take‐up, the hard commitment account proved most effective in building savings balances among our participants at the end of 6 months.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
