Abstract
BackgroundSoft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the hand are prone to unplanned excisions, altering oncologic outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare STS of the hand with initial treatment at an oncology center versus those initially treated at a non-oncology center. Additionally, we evaluated what factors were associated with oncologic outcomes. MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with a STS of the hand using ICD-9 codes along with an institutional oncologic database. We included all adult patients with a non-metastatic STS of the hand (n = 64) with a median follow up of 4.0 years (IQR:1.7–10.0). ResultsEight-three percent (n = 53) of tumors had an unplanned excision, of which one was treated at the oncology center. Patients treated primarily at an oncology center were older (57.6 vs. 43.6 years), had fewer operations and tended to have a larger tumors (median 4.7 cm vs. 3.0 cm) compared to those initially treated at a non-oncology center. The 5-year survival for patients treated at an oncology center was 60% compared to 89% in those initially treated at a non-oncology center. Worse disease-free survival was associated with positive final margins and subfascial tumors. ConclusionTumors with primary treatment at an oncology center were larger and presented in older patients, having worse overall survival compared to those initially treated at a non-oncology center. Initial treatment at a non-oncology center did not influence the oncologic outcomes, but lead to more re-excisions and amputations. Final tumor margins and tumor depth determined oncologic outcomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.