Abstract
Introduction: Limited research reveals that the use of different soft tissue mobilization techniques increases tissue mobility and decreases pain in various regions of the body. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a difference between instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and cupping therapy for neck and upper back discomfort. Methods: Subjects were treated for neck and upper back discomfort using one of two soft tissue mobilization techniques. They were assessed with a numeric rating scale, neck range of motions, and superficial skin temperature before and after each treatment to document changes observed. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in range of motion, superficial skin temperature, and pain numeric rating scale regardless of the treatment (P <.05). Conclusions: Both methods of soft tissue mobilization showed to have a significant impact on pain and neck range of motion. Based on patient-clinician collaborative treatment process, healthcare providers should consider IASTM and cupping therapy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
