Abstract

Among the requirements for engineering programs, the Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET) criteria for student outcomes require students to have the ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences, recognize ethical and professional responsibilities, function effectively on a team, and apply new knowledge. A review of literature for skills comprised within these ABET criteria determined 26 topics necessary for the entry-level and continued success of engineers. Nearly 500 companies and organizations rated the importance and proficiency of their recent entry-level engineers for these 26 identified soft (professional) skills. The findings suggest that although entry-level engineers have proficiency in all of these ABET required skills, the entry-level engineers were not meeting the level of importance expressed by the organization for 24 of these 26 skills. A specific ABET required skill, the ability to communicate effectively with diverse groups of people, has the greatest difference between the level of proficiency and the level of importance. Analysis of variance was conducted using each of the demographic variables to determine the effect sizes in the ratings of importance, proficiency, and the differences between importance and proficiency. These results were shared with industry members to confirm the relevance of the survey findings during the pandemic. This survey research has implications for any university engineering department where students are seeking entry-level engineering positions after graduation.

Highlights

  • The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology [1] identifies preparing students for engineering practice as one of the critical criteria for evaluating engineering education

  • Even though ABET articulates the need for engineering education to support the acquisition of non-technical skills and knowledge, it does not identify a specific set of soft skills on which engineering programs should focus

  • A new variable was calculated within the data set to have a difference in ratings value for each of the 26 soft skills rated by the respondents for their importance within their organization and proficiency displayed by the organization’s newly hired engineers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology [1] identifies preparing students for engineering practice as one of the critical criteria for evaluating engineering education. Even though ABET articulates the need for engineering education to support the acquisition of non-technical skills and knowledge, it does not identify a specific set of soft skills on which engineering programs should focus. Because the primary goal of engineering education is to prepare engineers for professional practice, university engineering departments need to turn to industry to understand what soft skills employers want their entry-level engineers (newly hired engineers) to possess and if employers are satisfied with the soft skills these new-hires demonstrate. The outcomes of the research enable engineering education programs to be responsive to industry needs for non-technical entry-level skill proficiency

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call