Abstract
Abstract This chapter examines how domestic courts give recognition, through their judicial reasoning, to soft law. The concept of soft law gives recognition to international normative standards which do not fall under the recognized sources of international law (conventions, custom, and the general principles of law). Within the context of the Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts (ILDC), soft law encompasses a range of standards which states consider that they ought to abide by and yet which may not fall under the three sources of international law. This chapter reviews a number of domestic court decisions selected primarily from the ILDC) to identify the kind of soft-law instruments invoked by domestic courts in their judicial reasoning, namely instruments of treaty monitoring bodies, instruments of a ‘conference of parties’, instruments of international organizations, and instruments adopted by inter-governmental forums.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.