Abstract

We present a method for bundling scenarios in a progressive hedging heuristic (PHH) applied to stochastic service network design, where the uncertain demand is represented by a finite number of scenarios. Given the number of scenario bundles, we first calculate a vector of probabilities for every scenario, which measures the association strength of a scenario to each bundle center. This membership score calculation is based on existing soft clustering algorithms such as Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) and Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM). After obtaining the probabilistic membership scores, we propose a strategy to determine the scenario-to-bundle assignment. By contrast, almost all existing scenario bundling methods such as K-Means (KM) assume before the scenario-to-bundle assignment that a scenario belongs to exactly one bundle, which is equivalent to requiring that the membership scores are Boolean values. The probabilistic membership scores bring many advantages over Boolean ones, such as the flexibility to create various degrees of overlap between scenario bundles and the capability to accommodate scenario bundles with different covariance structures. We empirically study the impacts of different degrees of overlap and covariance structures on PHH performance by comparing PHH based on FCM/GMM with that based on KM and the cover method, which represents the state-of-the-art scenario bundling algorithm for stochastic network design. The solution quality is measured against the lower bound provided by CPLEX. The experimental results show that, GMM-based PHH yields the best performance among all methods considered, achieving nearly equivalent solution quality in a fraction of the run-time of the other methods.

Highlights

  • Freight transportation concerns efficient distribution of commodities from one point to another utilizing an underlying network, such as the national highway system

  • The Progressive Hedging Heuristic based on K-Means, Fuzzy C-Means, Cover- and Gaussian Mixture Models-based scenario bundling are represented by KM-progressive hedging heuristic (PHH), FCM-PHH, Cover-PHH and GMM-PHH, respectively

  • We have presented a soft clustering-based scenario bundling method and modified the standard progressive hedging algorithm to incorporate the resulting scenario bundles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Freight transportation concerns efficient distribution of commodities from one point to another utilizing an underlying network, such as the national highway system. Each end-of-line terminal has a local service region and the shipments from various end-of-line terminals are usually combined to create truckloads of freight so that LTL carriers can spread the transportation cost out among as many customers as possible. This consolidation process is mainly performed at break-bulk terminals, where freight is unloaded, sorted, consolidated and reloaded onto the same or different vehicles (Jiang et al, 2017). To meet demands at certain end-of-line terminals from suppliers at other end-of-line terminals, LTL carriers need to determine which links connecting two terminals to travel along for a least-cost shipment of commodities. In order to offer customers high-quality services at competitive prices, LTL carriers have to make smarter tactical decisions about the selection, routing and scheduling of services (Crainic, 2000)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call