Sodium hyaluronate’s effect on xerophthalmia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

Background and aims:Several studies in the past have attempted to demonstrate the efficacy of sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of xerophthalmia. However, results have been conflicting and a definite conclusion has not yet been reached. In order to provide integrated evidence for the effectiveness of sodium hyaluronate and to judge the methodological value of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in nearly thirty years, we conducted this meta-analysis.Methods:A range of electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library Database, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) without language restrictions. Two independent reviewers assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and meta-analysis was performed using the STATA 12.0 software. An integrated odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated.Results:Six RCTs were included with a total of 839 xerophthalmia patients. The meta-analysis results revealed that patients with xerophthalmia who received the intervention of sodium hyaluronate eye drops didn’t have significantly higher remission rate of dry eye symptoms than those in controlled groups (OR = 1.811, 95% CI = 0.741–4.429, p = 0.193). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the statistical results were robust. No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis (p > 0.05).Conclusion:Although sodium hyaluronate can be used to help relieve the symptoms of dry eyes, present evidence cannot show in unequivocal terms that patients with xerophthalmia can benefit more from the clinical application of sodium hyaluronate than other eye drops or therapies.