Abstract
Sodium azide was compared with 10% formalin to evaluate sodium azide's effectiveness as a faecal preservative for intestinal helminths and protozoa. Faecal specimens collected from Haiti were preserved in sodium azide and in 10% formalin and analysed after 1.5, 6.5 and 11.5 weeks by examining direct wet-mount preparations. Sodium azide did not preserve the morphology of either helminths or protozoa as well as 10% formalin did. However, sodium azide prevented embryogenesis of helminth eggs, while some helminth eggs in 10% formalin contained living larvae. Biosafety guidelines regarding the toxicity, reactivity, and disposal of sodium azide were strictly followed. Use of 10% formalin is a significantly better choice than sodium azide for preserving parasites when accurate identification of parasites and biosafety are the main concerns.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
