Abstract
The latest research about the Spanish philosophical field between the late francoism and the democratic transition, pointed out the existence of two intellectual networks. On the one hand, an «official» section including the most scholar philosophers (e. g. Sergio Rabade). On the other hand, an «alternative» segment composed by the most vanguard thinkers (e.g. Lopez Aranguren). La filosofia espanola. Herederos y pretendientes. Una lectura sociologica (1963- 1990) (Vazquez Garcia 2009) employed a qualitative approach. Our goal, using the same sources, is to employ a correspondent analysis in order to put emphasis on reliability over validity. More than 15 variables about 50 Spanish philosophers have been measured. The conclusions explores the differences and similarities between the results obtained with the qualitative and quantitative methodologies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
