Abstract

Young people's wellbeing is often lowest where they assume a relatively low position within their school's socioeconomic hierarchy, for example, among poorer children attending more affluent schools. Transition to secondary school is a period during which young people typically enter an environment which is more socioeconomically diverse than their primary school. Young people joining a school with a higher socioeconomic status intake relative to their primary school may assume a relatively lowered position within their school’s socioeconomic hierarchy, experiencing a detriment to their wellbeing as a consequence. This article draws on data from 45,055 pupils in Years 7 and 8, from 193 secondary schools in Wales, who completed the 2017 Student Health Research Network (SHRN) Student Health and Wellbeing (SHW) survey. Pupils reported which primary school they previously attended, and survey data on wellbeing were linked to publicly available data on the free school meal entitlement of schools attended. In cross‐classified linear mixed‐effects models, with primary and secondary school as levels, mental wellbeing varied significantly according to both primary and secondary school attended. A higher school‐level deprivation was associated with worse mental wellbeing in both cases. Mental wellbeing was significantly predicted by the relative affluence of a child's primary and secondary school, with movement to a secondary school of higher overall socioeconomic status associated with lowered wellbeing. These findings highlight transition to secondary school as a key point in which socioeconomic inequality in wellbeing may widen, and thus as an important focal point for intervention to reduce health inequalities.

Highlights

  • Numerous indicators of health—such as disability-free life years, self-rated health, subjective wellbeing and life expectancy—improve as socioeconomic status (SES)The role of schools in reducing or increasing inequalities in wellbeingWhile one of many interconnected social influences on young people’s health and development (Moore et al, 2018), schools are commonly viewed as a channel for delivery of interventions to reduce childhood inequalities

  • This article has demonstrated via cross-classified multi-level analyses that in the first two years of secondary school, pupil mental wellbeing varies significantly according to both the primary school previously attended and the secondary school attended at the point of reporting

  • This is consistent with a conclusion of lasting primary school ‘effects’ on mental wellbeing, which endure beyond transition into secondary school, with the secondary school context contributing uniquely to variance in mental wellbeing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While one of many interconnected social influences on young people’s health and development (Moore et al, 2018), schools are commonly viewed as a channel for delivery of interventions to reduce childhood inequalities. This is largely due to their capacity to reach whole populations, but while some school-based actions reduce inequality, others increase it (Moore et al, 2015). Theorists such as Basil Bernstein have explained inequalities in education by highlighting a number of mechanisms through which schools act to reproduce or even legitimise inequalities present within wider society, commonly reflecting a more natural extension of the middle-class family environment (Bernstein, 1975)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call