Abstract

Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL) incorporates the European Commission's approach to Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). These relationships are elaborated into a pedagogic model encouraging young people to ask real-world questions that interest them, collect evidence to answer the questions and, as a result, to take personal action on their findings. After depicting a pedagogic model for SSIBL, we identify the opportunities for pre-service science teachers (PSTs) adopting a SSIBL approach. We detail SSIBL activity designs that aim to engage students in learning about the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. The findings show the prerequisite of using the science curriculum to facilitate SSIBL within the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We suggest a SSIBL approach would benefit from co-designed frameworks involving the collaboration of cross-disciplinary groups of teachers, through reflection and enactment on previous SSIBL activities. SSIBL enables practitioners to establish engaging contexts for science knowledge development, as well as to become more informed citizens.

Highlights

  • One of the main challenges for contemporary science and technology in Europe is informing democratic citizenship of the benefits, risks and ethical applications of developments

  • We present relevant opportunities that pre-service science teachers (PSTs) found while identifying areas of the curriculum related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and discuss the challenges they faced in adopting the Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL) approach as early career teachers

  • The PSTs’ reflective accounts highlighted their design intentions alongside what was possible within the context of their school expectations: As I went around the school, I noticed there were only three bikes in the bike shed, so I started wondering why so few students cycle to school? (Cath, cohort 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the main challenges for contemporary science and technology in Europe is informing democratic citizenship of the benefits, risks and ethical applications of developments. The uncertainties and hazards associated with technologies such as nanotechnology, genomics and robotics have been characterized as post-normal science (Funtowicz and Ravetz, 1993, 1994; Ravetz and Funtowicz, 1999). They exemplify the corporatization of science – the potential for vast profits from the huge changes generated by these technologies, together with hazards, risks and uncertainties.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call