Abstract

We propose a process graph (P-graph) approach to develop ecosystem networks from knowledge of the properties of the component species. Originally developed as a process engineering tool for designing industrial plants, the P-graph framework has key advantages over conventional ecological network analysis techniques based on input-output models. A P-graph is a bipartite graph consisting of two types of nodes, which we propose to represent components of an ecosystem. Compartments within ecosystems (e.g., organism species) are represented by one class of nodes, while the roles or functions that they play relative to other compartments are represented by a second class of nodes. This bipartite graph representation enables a powerful, unambiguous representation of relationships among ecosystem compartments, which can come in tangible (e.g., mass flow in predation) or intangible form (e.g., symbiosis). For example, within a P-graph, the distinct roles of bees as pollinators for some plants and as prey for some animals can be explicitly represented, which would not otherwise be possible using conventional ecological network analysis. After a discussion of the mapping of ecosystems into P-graph, we also discuss how this framework can be used to guide understanding of complex networks that exist in nature. Two component algorithms of P-graph, namely maximal structure generation (MSG) and solution structure generation (SSG), are shown to be particularly useful for ecological network analysis. These algorithms enable candidate ecosystem networks to be deduced based on current scientific knowledge on the individual ecosystem components. This method can be used to determine the (a) effects of loss of specific ecosystem compartments due to extinction, (b) potential efficacy of ecosystem reconstruction efforts, and (c) maximum sustainable exploitation of human ecosystem services by humans. We illustrate the use of P-graph for the analysis of ecosystem compartment loss using a small-scale stylized case study, and further propose a new criticality index that can be easily derived from SSG results.

Highlights

  • Mathematical models have proven to be valuable and useful tools for the analysis of ecological networks and their emergent properties

  • Despite the broad array of techniques already used in ecological network analysis, according to Poisot et al [3], “ecology will probably continue to benefit from those tools, metrics and models developed in other fields.”

  • We propose the extension of the process graph (P-graph) framework to ecosystem network structure and modeling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mathematical models have proven to be valuable and useful tools for the analysis of ecological networks and their emergent properties. Metrics to describe the structure of ecological networks naturally flowed from the use of such quantitative tools (e.g., [2]). These tools provide a lens for the analysis of complex interactions that arise from interactions among ecosystem components. Specialists only fully understand local interactions of ecosystem components, and need modelling techniques such as ecological network analysis to deduce high-level interactions that occur through direct and indirect linkages. Despite the broad array of techniques already used in ecological network analysis, according to Poisot et al [3], “ecology will probably continue to benefit from those tools, metrics and models developed in other fields.”. Despite the broad array of techniques already used in ecological network analysis, according to Poisot et al [3], “ecology will probably continue to benefit from those tools, metrics and models developed in other fields.” in this paper, we discuss a potential new tool for ecological network analysis

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call