Abstract

Demographers argue that human migration patterns are shaped by people moving to better environments. More recently, however, evolutionary theorists have argued that people move to similar environments to which they are culturally adapted. While previous studies analysing which factors affect migration patterns have focused almost exclusively on successful migrations, here we take advantage of a natural experiment during World War II in which an entire population was forcibly displaced but were then allowed to return home to compare successful with unsuccessful migrations. We test two competing hypotheses: (1) individuals who relocate to environments that are superior to their place of origin will be more likely to remain—The Better Environment Hypothesis or (2) individuals who relocate to environments that are similar to their place of origin will be more likely to remain—The Similar Environment Hypothesis. Using detailed records recording the social, cultural, linguistic and ecological conditions of the origin and destination locations, we find that cultural similarity (e.g. linguistic similarity and marrying within one’s own minority ethnic group)—rather than ecological differences—are the best predictors of successful migrations. These results suggest that social relationships, empowered by cultural similarity with the host population, play a critical role in successful migrations and provide limited support for the similar environment hypothesis. Overall, these results demonstrate the importance of comparing unsuccessful with successful migrations in efforts understand the engines of human dispersal and suggest that the primary obstacles to human migrations and successful range expansion are sociocultural rather than ecological.

Highlights

  • A fool learns from his own mistakes

  • We found almost no support for the Better Environment Hypothesis and some support for the Similar Environment Hypothesis

  • The top ranked models testing the Better Environment Hypothesis and the Similar Environment Hypothesis were compared against models using all available variables for the non-farmers and the farmers datasets, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research seeking to understand how the environment affects human migration has been focused almost exclusively on successful migrations. There is a pressing need to compare unsuccessful migrations with those that succeeded. This will provide insight into how humans were able to successfully inhabit a diverse range of habitats and expand their range across most of the planet [12] but will shed light on how dispersals occur and offer insight into contemporary immigration patterns today. The central purpose of this paper is to try to understand how both ecological and social factors in the origin and destination locations affect the success and failure of secondary migrations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.