Abstract

Group recommender systems support the identification of items that best fit the individual preferences of all group members. A group recommendation can be determined on the basis of aggregation functions. However, to some extent it is still unclear which aggregation function is most suitable for predicting an item to a group. In this paper, we analyze different preference aggregation functions with regard to their prediction quality. We found out that consensus-based aggregation functions (e.g., Average, Minimal Group Distance, Multiplicative, Ensemble Voting) which consider all group members’ preferences lead to a better prediction quality compared to borderline aggregation functions, such as Least Misery and Most Pleasure which solely focus on preferences of some individual group members.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call