Abstract

Domestic violence is an evil that never dies. It is an indicator of inequality, injustice and discrimination of the social system. Though there is no justification for its existence in a civilized society, then why it is so difficult to root it out? Why does it persist to exist even after the prevalence of legal provisions to combat domestic violence? The causes maybe embedded on the facts that it involves intimate relationship on the one hand and exercise of power relations on the other. These power relations put women at disadvantaged positions, which are prominently gendered in nature. Assam, a state in the north-eastern corner of India, is unique in its own distinction. It is a region with myriad communities with varied culture, ethnic and social background. Distinctive statistical differences of domestic violence exist among these communities. These variations may categorically be due to the nature of power relations in intimate relations among these communities, which is probed with the application of oral history method. An effort is made through this study to explore the societal attitudes concerning power within intimate human relations. The focus of this paper is to search for the social beliefs attached with the power relations that have been governing them or promoting them in the form of social values, customs, rituals and traditions, which are the nucleus of domestic violence in Assamese society. This study intends to investigate the power relations amongst the different communities. Oral history method is applied to probe the socialisation process of the victims of domestic violence and to analyse how it creates power relations that caters to domestic violence. It gives a deeper understanding to the gendered nature of power in intimate relations. It illustrates that power relations is created through socialisation process and is a contributing attribute to domestic violence among spouses.

Highlights

  • The findings suggest that the unequal power relations created through cultural training (Bhattacharyya, 2009, 2013; Chakrabarty, 2002) is one of the key contributing factors of Domestic Violence (DV) in intimate partnerrelations

  • A total number of 426 cases of DV under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 were registered during the year 2014, which is an increase of 0.1% from 2013 In the context of Assam, in 2014, there has been a large increase in the rate of registered cases under 489-A Indian Penal Code (IPC) (9626 cases, 62.1%)

  • In the light of these arguments, the primary objective of this research is to investigate how power relations are created through the process of socialisation, which in turn acts as a casual factor of DV

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Violence against women (VAW) is a form of human rights violation (Das et al, 2015a, forthcoming; Jaisingh, 1995). The commonest form of VAW is the intimate partner violence, which occurs within the private domain (AhmedGhosh, 2004; Bhattacharyya 2015; Chaudhary, 2013; Das et al, 2015a, forthcoming; Ragavan et al, 2015; Samarasekera and Horton, 2015; Umberson et al 1998; Yeasmeen, 2014; Vauquline, 2007). Consistent efforts and grassroots work of women’s organisations drew out VAW from the private domain to public attention and state accountability (Bhattacharyya, 2015; Das et al, 2015a, forthcoming; Samarasekera and Horton, 2015) It continues to persist as an evil practice in the society and becoming difficult to be rooted out. The role of culture, the traditional practices and the rituals associated with it acts as causal factors for VAW and, must be investigated as a social process of power relations than as mere sets of beliefs (Bhattacharyya, 2009; 2013; 2015; Chakrabarty, 2002) This creates an exploitative gender-based hierarchical society (Karlekar, 2008; Das et al, 2015 a, forthcoming). A total number of 426 cases of DV under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 were registered during the year 2014, which is an increase of 0.1% from 2013 In the context of Assam, in 2014, there has been a large increase in the rate of registered cases under 489-A IPC (9626 cases, 62.1%). Incidences of dowry deaths (189 cases, 1.2%) and cases under Dowry Prohibition Act are showing rising trends (92 cases, 0.6 %)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call