Abstract
AbstractThe concession period is one of the critical factors in the arrangement of a build-operate-transfer contract. For infrastructure that has major strategic, economic, and social effects, the concession period should balance the interests among the private investors, the government, and the users. However, existing research has more frequently discussed economic benefits rather than social welfare. In this regard, this paper proposes an improved model based on the traditional concession model by taking into account the case that the government might lower the service price in the posttransfer period to increase social welfare. This paper also introduces the optimal pricing methods for both concession and posttransfer period. The proposed methodology suggests a narrower concession interval, which helps improve the negotiation efficiency between the government and the private investor to a certain extent. The application of the proposed model is demonstrated by a case study of Western Harbor Tunnel in ...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
