Abstract

This article presents description of social structures such as, for example, states, in the context of their consideration as systems. Moreover, it seeks to develop K. Marx’s model in terms of systematic approach, as well as to justify the application of the Fibonacci sequence to systems in general and, in particular, to social systems. The description covers a wide range of issues, ranging from the assertion of the basic principle of living systems as patterns in resources flows to description of functions of various aspects of states and their economics in terms of objective needs of such structures. In addition, this article justifies synergetic effect based on proposed model, and the way this effect is applied to state systems. Moreover, it includes the description of main changes of socio-economic formations throughout the history as a natural development of social systems, including possible modern stages. The fundamental tool of this description is description of essence of the mechanism of property rights and its formation options. The differences of two extreme directions of such development are also described on the basis of the objective factor of resource provision. Special attention is given to the concept of surplus value as a feature of social production systems.

Highlights

  • This article was written with an aim to offer a small addition to the systems theory and to expand the materialistic approach to economics.We should start with an overview of general concepts

  • In the article we will only talk about living systems, including the most complex of them, social systems

  • Let us return to social systems, in particular to their economic component

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article was written with an aim to offer a small addition to the systems theory and to expand the materialistic approach to economics. When unified resources flows of several people consolidate into a common flow, the fluctuations of the total flow less affect individuals, increasing their resilience in different situations [8] For this reason, social systems formed by many people with a similar source of core resources and focused on their stable obtaining, are most important for its participants. When there are a lot of such groups, there is a set of leaders formed, so it will be more effective to fix their functions with a single mechanism – that is with a general statute and with a consolidated control and protection of these functions In this case, there is a unified system of production emerging in a state. Let us consider where the right of ownership could be extended in detail

Ownership
Difference Between Centralized and Competitive Systems
Surplus Value
Information
Systems Growth
Social Production Growth
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.