Abstract
The goal of this work the critical criteria that affect social sports competition organization's arrangement. Then determine the relations between criteria with others and alternatives. So, the evaluation of the process of social sports competition contains many conflict criteria. The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process is an effective tool for dealing with conflict and complex criteria. This work employs a new integrated model for dealing with the problem in an analytical hierarchal process (AHP) and Višekriterijumsko Kompromisno Rangiranje (VIKOR) methods under single-valued neutrosophic sets (SVNSs). SVNSs are the best tool for overcoming uncertainty and incomplete information. The AHP method is used for computing the weights of criteria then VIKOR is used for rank alternatives. The twelve criteria and five alternatives are used in this problem. An illustrative example is provided to present a robust hybrid model. This paper can help organizations and countries for arrangement and organize social sports completion with a scoring system design.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
