Abstract

This chapter aims to reconstitute the factors that led to formulating such a hypothesis and considers how they have been put to the test by economic crisis. As of the 1980s, the general trend towards increased social spending developed in successive stages. The persistence of ratchet effects following the depression phases of the business cycle contradicts the theoretical hypothesis of social spending as a growth engine. The theoretical justification for the argument is based on the concept of not limiting the analysis to the types of economic policies sustained by social spending, but rather reversing the perspective by associating these expenditures with the population quality they produce. Key studies carried out in the mid-20th century have shown that the historical increase in public spending followed a particular model alternating periodic increases and ratchet effects. Regulationist studies periodise structural changes in long-term growth by analysing its instability in terms of accumulation regimes and their crises.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.