Abstract

We test with data whether social mobility existed in late imperial China (1796-1905 AD) through its civil examination system. We find that measures of ability consistently predict the highest level of exam — jinshi — success, while direct measures of wealth do not. However, in addition to the significance of the father’s education, the official rank of one’s father and ancestors, which we use to proxy for family-specific tacit knowledge (or “cultural capital”), also strongly predicts actual exam performance. Thus, while unwittingly facilitated mobility, the civil examination system still transmitted hidden advantages among those possessed with endowments beyond that of human capital.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.