Abstract
We examine the impact of social media coverage on executive perk consumption, and we base the investigation on the agency view and efficiency view. Overall, we document that social media coverage does not have an impact on executive perk consumption. However, after distinguishing the motivations for perk consumption, we find that social media coverage reduces perk consumption in state-owned firms, supporting the agency view. We also find that social media coverage has a positive impact on perk consumption in private firms, which is consistent with the efficiency view. Heterogeneity analysis shows that in the sample of state-owned firms, the negative effect of social media coverage on perk consumption is more significant for firms with poor corporate governance and poor internal control. However, in the sample of private firms, the positive impact of social media coverage on perk consumption is more significant for firms lacking social networks and political connections as well as for high-tech firms. Finally, we show that social media coverage can mitigate the negative impact of perk consumption on firm performance overall. Our research helps to clarify the role of social media in the capital market in the internet era and has implications for dialectical views of perk consumption.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: International Review of Economics and Finance
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.