Abstract

Abstract In heterogeneous environments, dispersal may be hampered not only by direct costs, but also because immigrants may be locally maladapted. While maladaptation affects both sexes, this cost may be modulated in females if they express mate preferences that are either adaptive or maladaptive in the new local population. Dispersal costs under local adaptation may be mitigated if it is possible to switch to expressing traits of locally adapted residents. In a sexual selection context, immigrant females may learn to mate with locally favoured males. Mate‐choice copying is a type of social learning, where individuals, usually females, update their mating preferences after observing others mate. If it allows immigrant females to switch from maladapted to locally adapted preferences, their dispersal costs are mitigated as mate choice helps them create locally adapted offspring. To study if copying can promote the evolution of dispersal, we created an individual‐based model to simulate the coevolution of four traits: copying, dispersal, a trait relevant for local adaptation, and female preference. We contrast two scenarios with copying—either unconditional or conditional such that only dispersers copy—with a control scenario that lacks any copying. We show copying to lead to higher dispersal, especially if copying is conditionally expressed. This leads to an increase in gene flow between patches and, consequently, a decrease in local adaptation and trait‐preference correlations. While our study is phrased with female preference as the learned trait, one may generally expect social learning to mitigate dispersal costs, with consequent feedback effects on the spatial dynamics of adaptation. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Highlights

  • Mate-choice decisions may be based on innate preferences, individual experience or on the observed choices of others

  • To study if copying can promote the evolution of dispersal, we created an individual-based model to simulate the coevolution of four traits: copying, dispersal, a trait relevant for local adaptation, and female preference

  • Results show that mate-choice copying increases dispersal, especially when females are choosier

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Mate-choice decisions may be based on innate preferences, individual experience or on the observed choices of others. Mate-choice copying is argued to be adaptive because it allows the female to mate with higher quality mates (Gibson & Höglund, 1992; Nordell & Valone, 1998; Valone & Templeton, 2002; Danchin et al, 2004; Dugatkin, 2005; Uehara et al, 2005; Wagner & Danchin, 2010; reviews Vakirtzis & Roberts, 2012, Varela et al, 2018) This yields another question: why is copying needed to achieve a good outcome, i.e. why should any female not already possess preferences for best traits? It reduces the degree of local adaptation via improved gene flow (reduction of genetic differentiation between different habitats)

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call