Abstract

Existing social stressor concepts disregard the variety of task-related situations at work that require skillful social behavior to maintain good social relationships while achieving certain task goals. In this article, we challenge the view that social stressors at work are solely dysfunctional aspects evoking employee ill health. Drawing from the challenge-hindrance stressor framework, we introduce the concept of social challenge stressors as a job characteristic and examine their relationships with individual well-and ill-being. In study 1, we developed a new scale for the measurement of social challenge stressors and tested the validity of the scale. Results from two independent samples indicated support for a single-factor structure and showed that social challenge stressors are distinct from related stressor concepts. Using two samples, one of which was already used to test the factor structure, we analyzed the unique contribution of social challenge stressors in predicting employee well- and ill-being. As expected, social challenge stressors were simultaneously related to psychological strain and well-being. Using time-lagged data, study 2 investigated mechanisms that may explain how social challenge stressors are linked to well-being and strain. In line with the stress-as-offense-to-self approach, we expected indirect relationships via self-esteem. Additionally, social support was expected to moderate the relationships between social stressors and self-esteem. Whereas the indirect relationships were mostly confirmed, we found no support for the buffering role of social support in the social hindrance stressors-self-esteem link. Although we found a moderation effect for social challenge stressors, results indicated a compensation model that conflicted with expectations.

Highlights

  • Existing social stressor concepts disregard the variety of task-related situations at work that require skillful social behavior to maintain good social relationships while achieving certain task goals

  • We argue that existing social stressor concepts fail to consider frequently occurring group-related work demands that are an inherent part of task execution and require a kind of skillful social action to ensure goal accomplishment

  • To rule out that these relationships are caused by their link to other social stressor concepts, we investigated the unique contribution of social challenge stressors in predicting these outcomes by including task conflicts, relationship conflicts, and organizational injustice as statistical control variables in the analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Existing social stressor concepts disregard the variety of task-related situations at work that require skillful social behavior to maintain good social relationships while achieving certain task goals. Recent research has shown detrimental as well as beneficial effects of some stressors on individual well- and ill-being This has resulted in the introduction of the challenge-hindrance stressor framework (Cavanaugh, Boswell, Roehling, & Boudreau, 2000; LePine, Podsakoff, & LePine, 2005) distinguishing stressors based on their characteristics and impacts. For so-called challenge stressors, such as workload or job complexity, positive and negative effects have been found simultaneously Since this approach has many implications for work design, more and more studies take both hindrance and challenge stressors into consideration These requirements have often been attributed to leadership and are part of a leader’s role, and apply to all group members and constitute a job characteristic in many jobs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call