Abstract

• Social impact bonds introduce a financial logic to the monitoring of social goals. • There is no reliable means of measuring the social return on bonds. • Financial objectives and financial returns become prioritised. • Social investment operates as a model of inclusive neoliberalism in governing social care projects. The social turn in finance has brought with it a raft of innovations in finance and investment. For some this is a positive development that positions finance as a means for achieving positive social change. However, the notion that such innovation offers a softer or more benign finance is debated. In this paper we examine one recent innovation, social impact bonds (SIBs), and through a case study, we evaluate policy documents, press releases, interim reports and interviews with 4 key stakeholders in a recent UK SIB. In doing so, we contend that the case SIB embedded modalities of neoliberal governance further into contemporary social care and social relations. We argue that social investment is thus based around a model of inclusive neoliberalism and that the apparent innovations in social investment further embed finance and extractive logic deeper into social life. We conclude by suggesting that the practise of social investment will do nothing to resolve the social problems that they are designed to tackle.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call