Abstract

How does the visual design of digital platforms impact user behavior and the resulting environment? A body of work suggests that introducing social signals to content can increase both the inequality and unpredictability of its success, but has only been shown in the context of music listening. To further examine the effect of social influence on media popularity, we extend this research to the context of algorithmically-generated images by re-adapting Salganik et al's Music Lab experiment. On a digital platform where participants discover and curate AI-generated hybrid animals, we randomly assign both the knowledge of other participants' behavior and the visual presentation of the information. We successfully replicate the Music Lab's findings in the context of images, whereby social influence leads to an unpredictable winner-take-all market. However, we also find that social influence can lead to the emergence of local cultural trends that diverge from the status quo and are ultimately more diverse. We discuss the implications of these results for platform designers and animal conservation efforts.

Highlights

  • We investigate the role of social in￿uence and information design on ￿ve outcomes: inequality, unpredictability, diversity, divergence and engagement

  • For both the list and cloud displays, we ￿nd that worlds with social in￿uence exhibit more inequality than the worlds where participants made independent decisions (? = 0.002, preregistered), which is a direct replication of the Music Lab experiment

  • The circle packing algorithm placed most top voted ganimals near the center,. This explains why worlds in the social in￿uence cloud condition had the highest Gini coe￿cient on average: social in￿uence induced users to click on top voted ganimals near the center, further increasing inequality. For both inequality and unpredictability, we observed the same pattern observed in the Music Lab, that social in￿uence can increase the inequality and unpredictability of the success of content

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Theexplosionofinformationcontainedonmodernonlineplatformsrequiresuserstouseheuristics tobothe￿cientlysearchthroughthisinformation,andtomakeinformeddecisions.Onesuch heuristicisthesocialsignalsofhowotherusershaveengagedwiththeplatform.Socialin￿uence occurswhenthedecisionsofauserareimpactedbythoseofotherusers[10],andhasbeenshown tobeakeydesigndimensionforcontextsasvariedashealthbehavior[9],politicalengagement [5] , collective behavior [41], online book purchasing [8], food ordering [30], and digital news engagement[46,62].Theubiquityofsocialin￿uencesuggestshowcrucialafactoritisforplatform designersseekingtojointlyoptimizeforthequalityanddiversityofcontentonline[28].Perhapsthemostin￿uentialstudyonhowsocialin￿uenceandinformationhierarchyimpact onlineplatformsisthatofSalganiketal.[54],informallydubbedthe“MusicLab”experiment.In thisstudy,theauthorscreatedan“arti￿cialculturalmarket,”whereparticipantscouldlistento anddownloadpreviouslyunknownsongs.Critically,someparticipantswereprovidedalayout whichdisplayedinformationaboutpreviousparticipant’schoices,whiletheothershadnosuchProc. Salganik et al found that introducing social in￿uence increased the inequality of song success, as de￿ned by the number of times they were downloaded. This suggests a cascading “winner take all” phenomenon, whereby social in￿uence increased the availability of songs that were perceived as successful by past participants. They found that social in￿uence increased the unpredictability of success, as de￿ned by the variation in a song’s success across the worlds in an experimental condition. From these two ￿ndings, the authors infer that the underlying quality of a song only partly determines its ￿nal success: social in￿uence causes a snowball e￿ect that results in the emergence of local preferences

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call