Abstract

Objective: Investigate if there are educational inequalities in causes of death considered amenable to health care in Norway and compare this with non-amenable causes. Methods: The study used the concept of “amenable mortality”, which here includes 34 specific causes of death. A linked data file, with information from the Norwegian Causes of Death Registry and the Educational Registry was analyzed. The study population included the whole Norwegian population in two age groups of interest (25-49 and 50-74 years). Information on deaths was from the period 1990-2001. Education was recorded in 1990 and it was grouped in four categories as: basic, lower secondary, higher secondary and higher. In the study men and women were analysed seperately. The analysis was conducted for all amenable causes pooled with and without ischemic heart disease. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was fitted to estimate hazard rate ratios. Results: The study showed educational differences in mortality from causes of death considered amenable to health care, in both age groups and sexes. This was seen both when including and excluding ischemic heart disease. The effect sizes were comparable for amenable and non-amenable causes in both age groups and sexes. Conclusions: This study revealed systematic higher risk of death in lower educational groups in causes of death considered amenable to health care. This indicates potential weaknesses in equitable provision of health care for the Norwegian population. Additional research is needed to identify domains within the health care system of particular concern.

Highlights

  • Social inequalities in health have been reported in a number of Norwegian and international studies [1,2]

  • Studies based on the method of amenable mortality have to our knowledge never before been done in Norway

  • The analysis reveal systematic higher age adjusted hazard ratios for lower educational groups in men and women both in causes amenable as well as in causes considered non-amenable to health care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social inequalities in health have been reported in a number of Norwegian and international studies [1,2]. Causes of death considered amenable to health care is analysed to assess whether differences in treatment and care within the health care system contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in health. This has given rise to the development of a variety of terms including “mortality amenable to health care” and “avoidable mortality”, which were first coined by Rutstein in 1976. It was assumed that while not all deaths from causes considered amenable to health care would be avoidable, health care could contribute substantially to minimising mortality. While some causes are more closely related to primary care, others are more related to secondary care or prevention and health policy, such as vaccination

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call