Abstract

Phenotypes expressed in a social context are not only a function of the individual, but can also be shaped by the phenotypes of social partners. These social effects may play a major role in the evolution of cooperative breeding if social partners differ in the quality of care they provide and if individual carers adjust their effort in relation to that of other carers. When applying social effects models to wild study systems, it is also important to explore sources of individual plasticity that could masquerade as social effects. We studied offspring provisioning rates of parents and helpers in a wild population of long-tailed tits Aegithalos caudatus using a quantitative genetic framework to identify these social effects and partition them into genetic, permanent environment and current environment components. Controlling for other effects, individuals were consistent in their provisioning effort at a given nest, but adjusted their effort based on who was in their social group, indicating the presence of social effects. However, these social effects differed between years and social contexts, indicating a current environment effect, rather than indicating a genetic or permanent environment effect. While this study reveals the importance of examining environmental and genetic sources of social effects, the framework we present is entirely general, enabling a greater understanding of potentially important social effects within any ecological population.

Highlights

  • Social interactions, such as competition and cooperation, are key factors in evolution by natural selection as they generate fitness differences among individuals [1 –3]

  • Social effects may play a major role in the evolution of social systems [4,8,9,10], and are important to estimate for social traits in wild populations

  • Most of the consistency in provisioning rates was from differences between nests (VN/VCST 1⁄4 0.34, CI 1⁄4 0.25, 0.43), and each bird’s current environment effect (VCE/VCST 1⁄4 0.44, CI 1⁄4 0.27, 0.61)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social interactions, such as competition and cooperation, are key factors in evolution by natural selection as they generate fitness differences among individuals [1 –3]. On the other hand, investment is compensatory, with individuals adjusting their effort to maintain the same level of total care in the presence of helpers who vary in effort, social effects will exist between members of a breeding group. If the adjustment is proportional to the relative ability of a particular carer, the direct and social effects will be negatively correlated In this case, a parent would decrease their effort less in the presence of a poor helper compared with a good helper. The presence of a correlation between the direct and social effects depends on whether an individual adjusts its behaviour in response to the same phenotype of its group members. We investigated the relative magnitude of within-individual variation attributable to social effects and other factors

Methods
Results
Discussion
A PE CE PE CE
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call