Abstract

In many group-living animals, within-group associations are determined by familiarity, i.e. familiar individuals, independent of genetic relatedness, preferentially associate with each other. The ultimate causes of this behaviour are poorly understood and rigorous documentation of its adaptive significance is scarce. Limited attention theory states that focusing on a given task has interrelated cognitive, behavioural and physiological costs with respect to the attention paid to other tasks. In multiple signal environments attention has thus to be shared among signals. Assuming that familiar neighbours require less attention than unfamiliar ones, associating with familiar individuals should increase the efficiency in other tasks and ultimately increase fitness. We tested this prediction in adult females of the group-living, plant-inhabiting predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis. We evaluated the influence of social familiarity on within-group association behaviour, activity, predation and reproduction. In mixed groups (familiar and unfamiliar), familiar predator females preferentially associated with each other. In pure groups (either familiar or unfamiliar), familiar predator females produced more eggs than unfamiliar females at similar predation rates. Higher egg production was correlated with lower activity levels, indicating decreased restlessness. In light of limited attention theory, we argue that the ability to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar individuals and preferential association with familiar individuals confers a selective advantage because familiar social environments are cognitively and physiologically less taxing than unfamiliar social environments.

Highlights

  • Group-living is a widespread phenomenon in both invertebrate and vertebrate animals (Krause and Ruxton 2002)

  • In light of limited attention theory, we argue that the ability to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar individuals and preferential association with familiar individuals confers a selective advantage because familiar social environments are cognitively and physiologically less taxing than unfamiliar social environments

  • Several studies showed that differential treatment of familiar and unfamiliar individuals may occur independently of the degree of genetic relatedness and may be beneficial without indirect fitness gains, implying the existence of alternative or additional forces selecting for the ability to discriminate familiar and unfamiliar individuals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Group-living is a widespread phenomenon in both invertebrate and vertebrate animals (Krause and Ruxton 2002). Familiarity of group members, independent of genetic relatedness, may increase foraging efficiency (Griffiths et al 2004, Strodl and Schausberger 2012b) or may reduce aggressive and competitive behaviours (Ward and Hart 2003, Palphramand and White 2007, Höjesjö et al 1998), emotional stress (Takeda et al 2003) or predation risk (Chivers et al 1995, Ward and Hart 2003, Strodl and Schausberger 2012a) While all these studies show the behavioural consequences of familiarity and commonly assume familiarity to be adaptive, only few studies linked the behavioural observations with the interrelated cognitive processes (Griffiths et al 2004, Strodl and Schausberger 2012a), or provided a conclusive ultimate explanation for why the ability to recognise familiar individuals evolved in and should be beneficial for groupliving animals. Except for the study by Strodl and Schausberger (2012a), which shows that socially familiar juvenile mites react more quickly to approaching predators and survive longer under predation risk, experimental studies documenting the adaptive significance of social familiarity are lacking

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call