Abstract

Courtship behavior in Drosophila has often been described as a classic innate behavioral repertoire, but more recently extensive plasticity has been described. In particular, prior exposure to acoustic signals of con‐ or heterspecific males can change courtship traits in both sexes that are liable to be important in reproductive isolation. However, it is unknown whether male courtship song itself is socially plastic. We examined courtship song plasticity of two species in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Sexual isolation between the species is influenced by two male song traits, the interpulse interval (IPI) and sinesong frequency (SSF). Neither of these showed plasticity when males had prior experience of con‐ and heterospecific social partners. However, males of both species produced longer bursts of song during courtship when they were exposed to social partners (either con‐ or heterospecific) than when they were reared in isolation. D. melanogaster carrying mutations affecting short‐ or medium‐term memory showed a similar response to the social environment, not supporting a role for learning. Our results demonstrate that the amount of song a male produces during courtship is plastic depending on the social environment, which might reflect the advantage of being able to respond to variation in intrasexual competition, but that song structure itself is relatively inflexible, perhaps due to strong selection against hybridization.

Highlights

  • The role of behavioral flexibility in evolution is controversial (Bailey, Marie‐Orleach, & Moore, 2018; Price, Qvarnstrom, & Irwin, 2003)

  • We found that male fruit flies exposed to other males during development alter their song production

  • When reared in a social en‐ vironment with other individuals of the same sex, males of both spe‐ cies produce longer song bursts. This social effect was consistent regardless of which spe‐ cies the focal males experienced in previous social encounters

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

The role of behavioral flexibility in evolution is controversial (Bailey, Marie‐Orleach, & Moore, 2018; Price, Qvarnstrom, & Irwin, 2003). In species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup, several sex‐ ual traits show social plasticity (Schneider, Atallah, & Levine, 2017), including cuticular hydrocarbon profiles (Krupp et al, 2008), mate choice (Dukas, 2005; Mery et al, 2009), mating success (Billeter, Jagadeesh, Stepek, Azanchi, & Levine, 2012), and ejaculate charac‐ teristics (Garbaczewska, Billeter, & Levine, 2013; Sirot, Wolfner, & Wigby, 2011; Wigby et al, 2009) Both male and female responses to song were shown to be influenced by social experi‐ ence transmitted through species‐specific male courtship song itself (Li, Ishimoto, & Kamikouchi, 2018). We investigated the underlying mechanisms of song plasticity to the social environment, using neurological mu‐ tant strains that show learning and memory defects

| MATERIAL AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call