Abstract

INTRODUCTION The ILO constitution of 1919 enshrined the achievement of “social justice” as a core general objective of the organization. Following that broad objective, the International Labour Office proceeded to the specific task of investigating “every question appertaining to conditions of labor” (Thomas 1921a: 10–11). Studying “conditions of labor” requires a wide purview, encapsulating all the areas of research only later to be known as “social economics” (Clark 1936). Areas of study included working conditions and remuneration, population, health, housing, social services and pension schemes, unemployment insurance, and relief schemes and education. Later, one contribution to the Cambridge Economic Handbook Series succinctly outlined the social economist's modus operandi : to apply economic theory to social problems; to measure, where possible, the extent of social problems; to study the social causes of economic behavior; and to study the social consequences of economic behavior (Hagenbuch 1958:2). In all these respects, ILO researchers acted as social economists; the scope and method of their work was far from being narrowly confined by the conventional boundaries of contemporary economic theory. ILO social economists made generous allowances for “noneconomic,” social, or institutional aspects of human behavior. Often these factors rendered irrelevant or inapplicable much received microeconomic economic theory.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call