Abstract

Social development around the world has been stunted by the lack of a comprehensive understanding and definition of public value. Public value theory can provide guidance, and inform a universal standard for social development. However, it is difficult to define and measure public value due to its philosophical complexity. Public values are driven by various economic, political, and social forces, and can be created by many stakeholders including enterprises, governments and non-governmental organisations. Government is central to human society and is primarily responsible for inclusive social development, which requires setting and maintaining public values orderly and synchronously according to the plurality of views held by those in society. Social development failure may occur when some key public values are ignored. This study uses thirty economic, social, and political indicators to measure public value, and the results demonstrate strong correlations among them. Through a principal component analysis and a cluster analysis, these thirty indicators can be reduced to four principal components. The first one, which represents economic value, can explain 65.8% of the total information, identifying that economic value is playing a fundamental role among plural public values. Countries are clustered and their development neighbors are identified in order to compare countries with similar levels of development. Public value theory can help to understand the advantages and disadvantages of different countries, and advance the social and economic progress steadily and authentically.

Highlights

  • Against the background of a global market society, “creating value” has become a slogan of corporations and entrepreneurs

  • We find that economic value is the first principal component and can explain 65.8% of information of these indicators, and Synchronicity requires that all values should increase, at least not decrease, during a period

  • Four basic questions have been presented by Beck Jørgensen and Bozeman (2007): “What is the origin of public values? Is there a hierarchy of public values? What are the possibilities for assessing public values? (4) How do public values fit together?” (Wang, 2016, p. 135) These questions can be clearly answered by clarifying the various concepts of value in philosophy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Against the background of a global market society, “creating value” has become a slogan of corporations and entrepreneurs. Government and public sector can create public values (Moore, 1995), some are cherished by the general public and the entire society, including truth, goodness, beauty, freedom, justice, responsibility, innovation, etc These values cannot necessarily be measured in a monetary unit, and are the foundation of social development (Elkington, 1999; Scherer et al, 2016; Sheehy, 2015). As the second-largest economy and the world’s manufacturing hub, China has created a great amount of economic and related values.3 If it cannot create other political values such as democracy, freedom, the rule of law, and social values such as environmental protection and happiness, its development in the future will be uneven (Shambaugh, 2016). Four basic questions have been presented by Beck Jørgensen and Bozeman (2007): “What is the origin of public values? Is there a hierarchy of public values? What are the possibilities for assessing public values? (4) How do public values fit together?” (Wang, 2016, p. 135) These questions can be clearly answered by clarifying the various concepts of value in philosophy

Intrinsic Value and Extrinsic Value
Human Value and Universal Value
Objective Value and Subjective Value
Monistic Value and Plural Value
Private Value and Public Value
Social Development and the Indicators
Methods
Political Indicators
Social Indicators
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call