Abstract

Social density processes impact the activity and order of collective behaviours in a variety of biological systems. Much effort has been devoted to understanding how density of people affects collective human motion in the context of pedestrian flows. However, there is a distinct lack of empirical data investigating the effects of social density on human behaviour in cooperative contexts. Here, we examine the functioning and performance of human teams in a central-place foraging arena using high-resolution GPS data. We show that team functioning (level of coordination) is greatest at intermediate social densities, but contrary to our expectations, increased coordination at intermediate densities did not translate into improved collective foraging performance, and foraging accuracy was equivalent across our density treatments. We suggest that this is likely a consequence of foragers relying upon visual channels (local information) to achieve coordination but relying upon auditory channels (global information) to maximise foraging returns. These findings provide new insights for the development of more sophisticated models of human collective behaviour that consider different networks for communication (e.g. visual and vocal) that have the potential to operate simultaneously in cooperative contexts.

Highlights

  • We compared means for: (i) the total number of forage items collected by teams of different size, (ii) the accuracy of foraging collected one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s r(agnogoedtfeosrtafgoer/tpootsatl-fhooracgaen)a, alynsdis(iinii)SvPaSlSu4e5s(oefacChijd(τe)puensidnegnat variable was normally distributed as indicated by Shapiro-Wilk tests)

  • Whilst teams showed differing levels of coordination in motion, they all coordinated their decisions to relevant food patches. We believe that this may occur as a result of foragers’ ability to exchange information about the best foraging patches independent of their visual interaction ranges

  • Earlier experiments by King et al.[8] using the same set-up with smaller groups (N = 2–5) found that conversation was constant throughout experiments, suggesting verbal communication may allow information exchange across many members in a short time frame

Read more

Summary

Material and Methods

All GPS devices were time synchronised to UTS, providing the position vector, pi(t) = x (t)i + y (t)j + z (t)k, for each individual (i), for the duration (T) of the experiment T = {0, τ , 2τ , ..., 600τ }, τ = 1 second These GPS data were used to explore the functioning and performance of teams as described below. We calculate the mean velocity cross-correlation across all dyads Cij(τ) for τ between − 7 and + 7 seconds We chose this time period since foragers took a mean ± S.D. 7 ± 0.4 seconds to move between any foraging patch and the home base, and provides a coarse measure of how correlated the motion of the whole team was over a time period that is equivalent to one inward or outward movement. We compared means for: (i) the total number of forage items collected by teams of different size, (ii) the accuracy of foraging collected one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s r(agnogoedtfeosrtafgoer/tpootsatl-fhooracgaen)a, alynsdis(iinii)SvPaSlSu4e5s(oefacChijd(τe)puensidnegnat variable was normally distributed as indicated by Shapiro-Wilk tests)

Results
Discussion
Introduction
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call