Abstract

AbstractTo maximize fitness, animals choose habitats by using a combination of direct resource cues, such as the quality and quantity of safe breeding sites or food resources, and indirect social cues, such as the presence or breeding performance of conspecifics. Many reports show that nest predation leads to reduced fitness. However, it remains unclear how birds assess predation risk and how it affects breeding-site selection. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between predation risk and breeding-site selection in Barn Swallows (Hirundo rustica). We assessed the cues that swallows use in their selection. We used nest-site characteristics related to predation and foraging sites as direct resource cues, number of breeding pairs, and breeding success in the previous year as indirect social cues, and number of old and undamaged old nests as direct resource and/or indirect social cues. Breeding-site preference was assessed using the arrival date of males. We showed that only the number of undamaged old nests was used for breeding-site selection. When comparing effects at two spatial scales, nest-site and home-range, the effect of the number of undamaged old nests occurred at the home-range scale only, suggesting that these nests are used as an indirect social cue rather than a direct resource cue to reduce the energy or time-consuming costs of nest building. We suggest that undamaged old nests may indicate the presence and breeding performance of conspecifics for several previous years. Because Barn Swallows are migratory birds, undamaged old nests may be a reliable indirect social cue and may reduce the time required to sample information at breeding sites.

Highlights

  • Birds are known to gather information about habitat quality before making decisions on habitat selection (Jones 2001; Dale et al 2006)

  • The incidence of nest predation (7/32 nests) was negatively related to the narrowness of the entrances

  • We compared the significance of direct resource and indirect social cues for breeding-site selection in Barn Swallows

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Birds are known to gather information about habitat quality before making decisions on habitat selection (Jones 2001; Dale et al 2006) They select habitats by using a combination of direct resource cues, such as the quality and quantity of safe nest sites or food resources, and indirect social cues, such as the presence or breeding performance of conspecifics (Danchin et al 2004; Dall et al 2005). Social information about habitat quality is gathered compared to information on individual experiences in a changing environment (Danchin et al 2004) It remains unclear how birds assess nest predation risk and how it affects other factors in the decisionmaking process for breeding-site selection (Eggers et al 2006; Lima 2009). This is because nest predation is related to fine-scale factors, such as nest-site characteristics, whereas density mainly represents large-scale effects, such as food availability (Pulliam 1988; Martin 1998)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call