Abstract

Learning is a central ability for human development. Many skills we learn, such as language, are learned through observation or imitation in social contexts. Likewise, many skills are learned implicitly, that is, without an explicit intent to learn and without full awareness of the acquired knowledge. Here, we asked whether performance in a motor learning task is modulated by social vs. object cues of varying validity. To address this question, we asked participants to carry out a serial reaction time (SRT) task in which, on each trial, people have to respond as fast and as accurately as possible to the appearance of a stimulus at one of four possible locations. Unbeknownst to participants, the sequence of successive locations was sequentially structured, so that knowledge of the sequence facilitates anticipation of the next stimulus and hence faster motor responses. Crucially, each trial also contained a cue pointing to the next stimulus location. Participants could thus learn based on the cue, or on learning about the sequence of successive locations, or on a combination of both. Results show an interaction between cue type and cue validity for the motor responses: social cues (vs. object cues) led to faster responses in the low validity (LV) condition only. Concerning the extent to which learning was implicit, results show that in the cued blocks only, the highly valid social cue led to implicit learning. In the uncued blocks, participants showed no implicit learning in the highly valid social cue condition, but did in all other combinations of stimulus type and cueing validity. In conclusion, our results suggest that implicit learning is context-dependent and can be influenced by the cue type, e.g., social and object cues.

Highlights

  • In everyday life, humans often share their inner experiences with others non-verbally, making use of gestures, facial expressions or gaze behavior

  • These results show that participants were able to follow the given instructions and managed not to be substantially distracted by the invalid cues in the low validity (LV) condition

  • This study investigated the influence of two cue types, i.e., social and non-social/object, with different cueing validities, high and LV, on motor responses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans often share their inner experiences with others non-verbally, making use of gestures, facial expressions or gaze behavior. Social Cues and Motor Learning morphology, amongst which a white sclera that makes it possible to identify the gaze direction of conspecifics even from large distances (Kobayashi and Kohshima, 2001). This morphology might have developed as a remote non-verbal communication signal. Eye contact, coupled with theory-of-mind-driven mechanisms, subtend non-verbal social communication in humans and animals (Butterworth and Cochran, 1980; BaronCohen, 1992; Emery, 2000) and shape the initiation and regulation of social interaction (Argyle and Cook, 1976; Macrae et al, 2002; Kuzmanovic et al, 2009). The interpretation of the gaze-behavior of another person, despite its inherent ambiguity, is a very salient cue in social interaction and can convey multi-faceted, rich information about both the other persons state of mind as well as about important features of the environment in which both agents are interacting

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call