Abstract

The Community Conservation Partnership Agreement (KKM) was an effort to reduce, prevent and mitigate the impacts arising from the complexity of managing Lore Lindu National Park. Several approaches in building KKM in the National Park had been carried out by several parties but had not proceeded as expected. Social Contracts were built to advance community agreements. The purpose of this study was to explore the obstacles and strategies for implementing KKM in the National Park. A qualitative approach was used in this study, through in-depth interviews, field observations, and active research in the process of drafting the KKM agreement. The results showed there were multiple interpretations of the roles, functions, and work of the parties based on their authority and interests in building the KKM. This resulted in the KKM becoming unsustainable. Findings show that in order to re-establish the KKM requires strategic steps, which mediate across stakeholder interests. Partnerships towards effective social contracts would only succeed if there was recognition of, and meaningful involvement among parties that begin at the design and planning processes and continue throughout the implementation phases of the partnership activities. The process of building a social contract must therefore begin with solid communication between stakeholders, which establish institutional mechanisms that are systematic, promote active coordinative, and are based on the trust and understanding between stakeholders.

Highlights

  • Lore-Lindu National Park (LLNP) was officially confirmed by the Minister of Forestry and Plantations in 1999

  • Data collection consisted of the following: Historical data collected about the management of national parks and the KKM program in the study area; direct engagement with communities living in and interacting with forest areas; examining the KKM formed by The Nature Conservancy (TNC); evaluating the KKM as part of broader revitalization interests in Lembah Bada; as well as considering the potential supporters of implementing social contracts and the identification of problems or obstacles in the application among counterparts

  • Community interaction with LLNP had been ongoing for a long time beginning in the 1970s before the area was established as a national park

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lore-Lindu National Park (LLNP) was officially confirmed by the Minister of Forestry and Plantations in 1999. As a national parks with a unique social culture, LLNP could not be separated from the challenges of land claims and forest encroachment. This issues hasa been problematic through the history of LLNP management. The trigger factor for conflicts around forest areas in and around LLNP was the lack of clarity of policies designed by the government. Another aspect raised by Maesen and Cadman (2015) was the dilemma in forest conservation efforts relative to development indicators of local populations. Another aspect raised by Maesen and Cadman (2015) was the dilemma in forest conservation efforts relative to development indicators of local populations. Satyanarayana et al (2012) added that unclear information about community rules, regulations and rights (see Chankrajang, 2019) and the role of stakeholders in forest management caused tensions and flared up as conflicts (Gupta and Koontz, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call