Abstract

In order to maximise fitness individuals should adjust their level of signalling according to their surrounding social environment. However, field experiments showing such adjustment of current signalling associated to changes in social context are lacking. Here, we manipulated levels of male aggressive- and dominance-related displays in a wild bird in our treated area by increasing testosterone levels using implants in a subset of males. We then compared the expression of sexual signals (i.e. comb size) between non-treated red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus males from control and treatment areas. We further explored the potential endocrinological mechanism linking social environment and signal expression by analysing testosterone levels in all males. Our treatment successfully increased overall aggressive- and dominance-related behaviours in the treatment area. Furthermore, testosterone-implanted birds increased their comb size as repeatedly shown in previous studies in male red grouse. Interestingly, untreated males living in the treatment area decreased their comb size, whilst increasing testosterone levels. Since comb size is a signal of dominance, untreated males from the treatment area may have perceived themselves as subordinate individuals and decreased their signalling levels to avoid confrontations with testosterone-treated, dominant individuals. In conclusion, our findings show that social context has the potential to regulate sexual signalling and testosterone levels. Our results highlight the role of social context when exploring the link between testosterone and behaviour, as it may reverse the relationship between both traits. Our results suggest that social context affects signalling and testosterone independently.

Highlights

  • In animal communication, signals can be defined as phenotypic traits produced by the signaller that have evolved because they change the behaviour of receivers in ways that benefit the signaller (Maynard Smith and Harper, 2003)

  • Animal communication theories predict that social environment can affect signal expression, yet experimental tests of this prediction in the field are lacking

  • We showed that male red grouse decreased their sexual signalling levels when levels of

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Signals can be defined as phenotypic traits produced by the signaller that have evolved because they change the behaviour of receivers in ways that benefit the signaller (Maynard Smith and Harper, 2003). The presence and quality of receivers changes over time and space so, to maximise the benefits associated with signalling, the signallers have to alter the expression of their signal according to their surrounding environment. It is expected that individuals adjust the expression of a signal according to the context in which they live Social context is among the most important factors that affect animal communication, the expression and reliability of signals (Burmeister and Wilczynski, 2000; Vergara et al, 2012a). Changes in population sex-ratio (Gautier et al, 2008) or dominance hierarchy can affect the expression of social or sexual signals, as socially subordinate individuals often reduce investment in signalling (Burmeister et al, 2005; Karubian et al, 2011; Setchell and Dixon, 2001; Zuk and Johnsen, 2000).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call