Abstract

It has been much debated whether epistemic relativism in academia, for instance in the form of social constructivism, the strong programme, deconstructionism, and postmodernism, has paved the way for the recent upsurge in science denial, in particular climate science denial. In order to provide an empirical basis for this discussion, an extensive search of the social science literature was performed. It showed that in the 1990s, climate science was a popular target among academic epistemic relativists. In particular, many STS scholars used it as an allegedly clear example of claims by natural scientists that should be treated as mere social constructions, rather than as reports on the actual state of the natural world. A few connections between social constructivists and corporate science denialism were also uncovered, but the extent of such connections could not be determined. With few exceptions, the stream of criticism of climate science from academic relativists has dwindled since the 1990s. One reason for this seems to be that the contrarian position lost its attraction when it became associated with corporate and right-wing propagandists.

Highlights

  • In the last few decades, we have seen a remarkable rise of politically influential science denialism, directed in particular at climate and environmental science.1 Business interests have had a substantial role in funding these attacks on science (Oreskes and 37 Page 2 of 27European Journal for Philosophy of Science (2020) 10: 37Conway 2010)

  • If anthropogenic climate change is a social construction, and other social constructions in which it does not exist are valid, it is difficult to see why we should do anything about it. As absurd as this conclusion is, it seems to be an unavoidable consequence of the strong statements of social constructivism and epistemic relativism that abound in several branches of social science literature from the last half-century

  • The second and much stronger type of evidence is documentation showing that academic epistemic relativists have themselves expressed opinions supporting climate science denialism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the last few decades, we have seen a remarkable rise of politically influential science denialism, directed in particular at climate and environmental science.1 Business interests have had a substantial role in funding these attacks on science (Oreskes and

37 Page 2 of 27
Argument patterns usable for climate science denial
Actual support of climate science denialism
Frederick Buttel and co-workers
37 Page 6 of 27
37 Page 8 of 27
Nicholas Fox
William Cronon
37 Page 10 of 27
Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavsky
Brian Wynne
37 Page 12 of 27
Steven Yearley
37 Page 14 of 27
The general picture
37 Page 16 of 27
Acknowledged influence on climate science denialists
37 Page 18 of 27
Discussion
Why so strong support for climate science denialism?
37 Page 20 of 27
What does this mean for philosophy?
37 Page 22 of 27
Conclusion
Findings
37 Page 24 of 27
37 Page 26 of 27
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call