Abstract
Against the background of growing discontent over excessive leniency of US and EU competition policy, this article argues that the policy displays characteristics corresponding to those that brought about the social capture of financial policy co-responsible for the late 2000s global crisis. The prevailingly anti-interventionist worldview of competition practitioners working as industry representatives threatens to disproportionately affect the mindset of competition officials through three channels of social influence concerning self-identification, social status, and interpersonal relationships. Regardless of whether these channels have been actively shaped by the industry, their existence poses a risk that competition policy might be designed and enforced in a way that furthers industry interests to the detriment of consumers and small businesses, which risk might have already materialised in the excessive leniency of the policy. The article also discusses measures to prevent social capture such as promotion of diversity and reduction of revolving door, cautioning nevertheless that difficult trade-offs may need to be made in their implementation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.