Abstract

This brief gives an overview of the evidence, gaps and future directions for social assistance and climate resilience, with a particular focus on FCAS. Drawing on a recent literature review, we examine existing debates and consider that climate-related social assistance in FCAS involves particular challenges, including risks of maladaptive support.

Highlights

  • Social assistance – such as cash transfers and voucher programmes – has been seen as a way of reducing the impacts of climate-related shocks and stressors, and of increasing the resilience of recipient households and communities. It has been seen as a mechanism for delivering adaptation funding, showing promise in tackling short-term shocks as well as longer-term adaptation to climate change

  • Many questions remain over the suitability and evidence for linkages, and how and under what conditions social assistance interventions may successfully strengthen climate resiliience, and for whom. This brief gives an overview of the evidence, gaps and future directions for social assistance and climate resilience, with a particular focus on Fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS)

  • Drawing on a recent literature review, we examine existing debates and consider that climate-related social assistance in FCAS involves particular challenges, including risks of maladaptive support

Read more

Summary

Theme summary

Changing, risks to people and livelihoods. Fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS) host some of the world’s most vulnerable populations. Social assistance – such as cash transfers and voucher programmes – has been seen as a way of reducing the impacts of climate-related shocks and stressors, and of increasing the resilience of recipient households and communities It has been seen as a mechanism for delivering adaptation funding, showing promise in tackling short-term shocks as well as longer-term adaptation to climate change. Drawing on a recent literature review, we examine existing debates and consider that climate-related social assistance in FCAS involves particular challenges, including risks of maladaptive support. This thematic brief is a shortened version of a BASIC Research Working Paper. All costs related to BASIC Research are covered by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office

State of the evidence and debate
Gaps in the evidence
Directions for research
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call