Social activity and cognitive functioning over time: a coordinated analysis of four longitudinal studies.

Cassandra L Brown,K Warner Schaie,Steven D Shirk,Alireza Atri,Cynthia R Cimino,Robert F Kennison,Andrea M Piccinin,Scott M Hofer,Stuart W S Macdonald,Meghan B Mitchell,Elizabeth M Zelinski,Andreana Benitez,Laura E Gibbons,Boo Johansson,Sherry L Willis,Magnus Lindwall,Roger A Dixon,Dan M Mungas,Annie Robitaille

doi:10.1155/2012/287438

Abstract

Social activity is typically viewed as part of an engaged lifestyle that may help mitigate the deleterious effects of advanced age on cognitive function. As such, social activity has been examined in relation to cognitive abilities later in life. However, longitudinal evidence for this hypothesis thus far remains inconclusive. The current study sought to clarify the relationship between social activity and cognitive function over time using a coordinated data analysis approach across four longitudinal studies. A series of multilevel growth models with social activity included as a covariate is presented. Four domains of cognitive function were assessed: reasoning, memory, fluency, and semantic knowledge. Results suggest that baseline social activity is related to some, but not all, cognitive functions. Baseline social activity levels failed to predict rate of decline in most cognitive abilities. Changes in social activity were not consistently associated with cognitive functioning. Our findings do not provide consistent evidence that changes in social activity correspond to immediate benefits in cognitive functioning, except perhaps for verbal fluency.

Highlights

Cognitive decline in older adulthood remains an area of great concern as the population ages
The current analysis examines the relationship between social activity, change in social activity, and four domains of cognition including: reasoning, memory, fluency, and semantic knowledge in four different populations
Semantic knowledge results were less consistent, with Seattle Longitudinal Study (SLS) showing no age differences, b = 0.02, P = .35, Long Beach Longitudinal Study (LBLS) and OCTO-Twin suggesting the older individuals score worse, b = −0.28, P < .01, and b = −0.55, P < .01, respectively, and Victoria Longitudinal Study (VLS) finding that older individuals performed slightly better, b = 0.08, P =

Summary

Introduction

Cognitive decline in older adulthood remains an area of great concern as the population ages. Substantial evidence suggests that lifestyle factors and cognitive function in older adulthood are related [3]. Sometimes summarized by the adage “use it or lose it,” current evidence suggests that leading an active lifestyle “using it” may buffer the effects of agerelated cognitive decline “losing it” [3,4,5]. The mechanisms by which an active and engaged lifestyle may be related to better or preserved cognitive function in older adulthood remain to be fully elucidated. The cognitive reserve hypothesis predicts that some individuals are better able to withstand the physiological insults to the brain without measurable cognitive deficits because they had greater capacity to begin with [6]. Individuals may be able to actively increase their “reserve” through engaging in cognitively stimulating activities [3]

Methods

Results

Conclusion