Abstract
I challenge Kern’s theory concerning the three ways to Husserl’s transcendental reduction from the point of view of its theoretical content and its examples. I argue that this theory is built upon the idea of attributive conditioning and the concomitant hypothesis of the textual discontinuity of the ways. My refutation focuses on internal contradictions of the theory and the lack of contextual examples.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.