Abstract

I challenge Kern’s theory concerning the three ways to Husserl’s transcendental reduction from the point of view of its theoretical content and its examples. I argue that this theory is built upon the idea of attributive conditioning and the concomitant hypothesis of the textual discontinuity of the ways. My refutation focuses on internal contradictions of the theory and the lack of contextual examples.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call