Abstract
Popper main epistemological thesis called falsifiability is related to critical aspect that must embody Sciences. For the author, both as the Natural Social Sciences share the scientific method, but some argue, against Popper himself, that the methods are different. This review will be the starting point of this paper, as we shall see in what sense the methods are indeed different, in order to analyze whether this difference also influences the critical aspect of science. So first we will study briefly what critique accor-ding to falsifiability both the Social Sciences and the Natural; see their similarities and differences and then analyze whether this form of review is applicable to both science.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
